Digital theatre is a system that allows players to interact with a video using the screen of a computer. It is similar to a video game in that players move through a series of screens using a joystick, and the graphics and sounds change on a regular basis.
I don’t know if digital theatre is the future of movie goers, but there are two interesting things about digital theatre. The first is the fact that it allows a TV viewer to watch the same movie as an audience, or to watch a movie that another viewer has recorded. The other is the fact that the system is free.
The second thing that digital theatre can do is allow a movie to be viewed at a variety of different screen sizes. Currently, most digital theatre systems are only able to show 2:3 aspect ratios. This is because these systems are created to allow as many people as possible to view the same movie at the same time. The problem is that the 2:3 aspect ratio is probably the most common, and the only one that many people will be able to enjoy.
Now in theory, if you have a digital theatre system, it should allow you to play any movie at any size, and a digital cinema projector should be able to show movies from almost anywhere in the world. Unfortunately, these systems are only able to show movies from the US and Canada in any size, as many of these systems are only allowed to show movies from these two countries in any size.
So there’s nothing wrong with the 23 aspect ratio. But what’s wrong is that it’s not so common. But when you take a look at the US cinema market alone, it’s pretty much one of the only markets that is going to have a 23 aspect ratio digital theatre system. This is because when a digital theatre system is created in the US, it has to follow the US’s Cinemas and Video Installations Code.
So the question is, will you choose to have a digital theatre system in your house that will not be allowed to show movies in 23 aspect ratio in the US? Or will you choose to have a digital theatre system that will not be allowed to show movies in 23 aspect ratio in Canada, and thus you can watch them at home as long as you have a digital cinema card in your card reader.
There is a lot of controversy surrounding the US Digital Cinema Code. Some believe it is confusing and that it prevents the creation of new movies and movies that are similar to older movies. Others have argued it is a way for studios to squeeze more money out of home video distributors. There is also a lot of debate about whether the US Digital Cinema Code is actually good for the movie industry overall.
I’m with the first group. I’m sure the US Digital Cinema Code is confusing but it’s not like the industry can’t get more films to market and there aren’t enough people making their own home video releases. The Digital Cinema Code has been in effect in the United States since 2006. But it’s been a bit of a mess. The Code doesn’t have a good track record at all.
The main point to take from this discussion is that the Code is a bit of a joke. The only people who really benefit are the companies creating the content, the studios, and the people who buy the movies. The other major problem is that it is an example of bureaucracy, rather than any sort of real attempt at bettering the industry.
The Code is not an example of anything, it was created specifically so that studios could avoid having huge costs of hiring and paying talent. It was created without the idea of making money or making a profit. It is an example of the way Hollywood works. Instead of the studios making money, they make the rules. They create the rules about what movies should look, sound, and feel like. This is why the Code is such a problem.
